I recently came across the following piece (www.SuperHub.com/PrietoPaper.pdf) on the vulnerability of tightly coupled systems that can go unidentified for a very long time. What may look like random events or issues can actually be highly coupled.
Take the simple example of a fire in a small building outside of Chicago that disrupted telephone service for much of the country. Why? Because "It seems that most transcontinental land-lines passed through that single building and they were destroyed in the fire." Excuse me? How could somebody not know, or know and not do something about, that vulnerability? And, why did the price of anti-freeze go up 300% a while back? Turns out ethylene glycol was made in only two places in the US and one of them, a small plant in Idaho, burned down with the obvious result.
You'll enjoy this article; it's short and punchy and can help you ask questions that could potentially illuminate a blind spot, or two.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Al-Zawahiri Didn't Care if You Starve .... Neither Does Your Competition
[The following is provided courtesy of Tal Newhart of Parcon Research]
What we seem to be forgetting & why we're in trouble
A finance journalist, and reader of this occasional newsletter, called last week to ask what I thought about the $700 billion bail out plan. The conversation quickly expanded into a discussion of "What happened?". He was referring to the larger picture, as in 'What happened to us [the United States]?' Basically, he was asking what happened to Chrysler, Wall Street, Main Street, you and me, etc. In fact, as I write this on Monday the Dow is down 400 (four h-u-n-d-r-e-d) points.
Well obviously, it's complex. But I think a lot of it stems from 9/11 which was so classic it now seems grimly inevitable. I wrote about the tactic in a corporate setting in a CorpWar way back in March 2003 (to review go here: Concentration of Force). Al-Zawahiri, one of Osama bin Laden's key strategists, knew the only way to bring us down, arguably the most 'powerful' civilization in history, was to help us bring ourselves down. Aside from our spirit America is also a business and as such we 'behave' like a business. And all businesses have their weaknesses which are too often discernable to our competition (e.g. al-Zawahiri, or picture your own competition-there really is no difference). So al-Zawahiri helped come up with this cheap little plan, pretty crude really, and sent a huge arrow dead center into our economic heart. And, let's face it, it's been pretty rough sailing ever since. And if you don't think so you and I don't live in the same galaxy.
If you think your business is any different you are part of the problem. You need to think better. You need to think stronger. We all work for our stakeholders. We OWE them our best, now more than ever, because things are starting to fall apart. And if we don't give it to them we should be replaced. Period. This is no time for dull, slacker, thinking folks.
I've taken on the role of new business development for ScreeningInterviews.com (technically a spin-off) and have noticed a couple of alarming things. To put this in context the service does screening interviews of a client's "short list" of an open job's candidates and makes those recordings available to management so they can efficiently comment on whether or not they think a candidate would be a good fit to the company. Pretty simple.
Now, managers that use the tool typically love it but, conversely, some really hate it (actually loathe everything about it). When I drill in to understand why, it's typically because "things work well enough as they are". All I can say is stop, RIGHT THERE. This is the kind of thinking that some clever guy in a corporate cave somewhere (a.k.a. your competition, some of whom you probably aren't even aware of) is waiting to exploit. This mindset insists "things are cool enough now, we'll survive". Really? Think again. If you're sitting around thinking your business is some sort of invincible fort I GUARANTEE you somebody, somewhere, is x-raying your walls to find weak spots. They are focusing on YOU, trying to find YOUR Twin Towers. And we all know the potential result.
Another thing I've noticed because of ScreeningInterviews.com is the quality of many of the candidates (the resumes are supplied by the client's HR department or retained recruiting companies-we have no control over what we get). I do some of the interviews myself, and listen to many of the others and I'm often shocked at what I hear. We typically interview 4-5 candidates per position and often 1 or 2, sometimes even 3 of these candidates are pretty poorly qualified for the position (even internal candidates up for internal transfer). Sometimes egregiously so. It's just so vivid in the recording that they can't do the job you have to ask yourself, how did these people get on a short list? Sometimes, of course, the process lets somebody really shine that looks weak on paper (that's great when it happens, by the way), but more often we uncover expensive hiring mistakes waiting to happen. Often their only real skill is knowing how to game the hiring system. Thank god we help weed them out.
Look, you need to impress everybody around you, everybody in your company, that there are barbarians at the corporate gate, because functionally there really are. This is no time for lazy, yesterday thinking because competitors that need to eat are hunkered down trying to figure out how to steal your food. This is capitalism folks. Your competition doesn't care if you starve.Think about it.
Feel free to contact me about http://www.screeninginterviews.com/. It's useful at helping you efficiently identify winners and avoid losers.
TalTal Newhart (e-mail)ScreeningInterviews.com847.462.0632 dd
What we seem to be forgetting & why we're in trouble
A comment by T.S. Newhart
Well obviously, it's complex. But I think a lot of it stems from 9/11 which was so classic it now seems grimly inevitable. I wrote about the tactic in a corporate setting in a CorpWar way back in March 2003 (to review go here: Concentration of Force). Al-Zawahiri, one of Osama bin Laden's key strategists, knew the only way to bring us down, arguably the most 'powerful' civilization in history, was to help us bring ourselves down. Aside from our spirit America is also a business and as such we 'behave' like a business. And all businesses have their weaknesses which are too often discernable to our competition (e.g. al-Zawahiri, or picture your own competition-there really is no difference). So al-Zawahiri helped come up with this cheap little plan, pretty crude really, and sent a huge arrow dead center into our economic heart. And, let's face it, it's been pretty rough sailing ever since. And if you don't think so you and I don't live in the same galaxy.
If you think your business is any different you are part of the problem. You need to think better. You need to think stronger. We all work for our stakeholders. We OWE them our best, now more than ever, because things are starting to fall apart. And if we don't give it to them we should be replaced. Period. This is no time for dull, slacker, thinking folks.
I've taken on the role of new business development for ScreeningInterviews.com (technically a spin-off) and have noticed a couple of alarming things. To put this in context the service does screening interviews of a client's "short list" of an open job's candidates and makes those recordings available to management so they can efficiently comment on whether or not they think a candidate would be a good fit to the company. Pretty simple.
Now, managers that use the tool typically love it but, conversely, some really hate it (actually loathe everything about it). When I drill in to understand why, it's typically because "things work well enough as they are". All I can say is stop, RIGHT THERE. This is the kind of thinking that some clever guy in a corporate cave somewhere (a.k.a. your competition, some of whom you probably aren't even aware of) is waiting to exploit. This mindset insists "things are cool enough now, we'll survive". Really? Think again. If you're sitting around thinking your business is some sort of invincible fort I GUARANTEE you somebody, somewhere, is x-raying your walls to find weak spots. They are focusing on YOU, trying to find YOUR Twin Towers. And we all know the potential result.
Another thing I've noticed because of ScreeningInterviews.com is the quality of many of the candidates (the resumes are supplied by the client's HR department or retained recruiting companies-we have no control over what we get). I do some of the interviews myself, and listen to many of the others and I'm often shocked at what I hear. We typically interview 4-5 candidates per position and often 1 or 2, sometimes even 3 of these candidates are pretty poorly qualified for the position (even internal candidates up for internal transfer). Sometimes egregiously so. It's just so vivid in the recording that they can't do the job you have to ask yourself, how did these people get on a short list? Sometimes, of course, the process lets somebody really shine that looks weak on paper (that's great when it happens, by the way), but more often we uncover expensive hiring mistakes waiting to happen. Often their only real skill is knowing how to game the hiring system. Thank god we help weed them out.
Look, you need to impress everybody around you, everybody in your company, that there are barbarians at the corporate gate, because functionally there really are. This is no time for lazy, yesterday thinking because competitors that need to eat are hunkered down trying to figure out how to steal your food. This is capitalism folks. Your competition doesn't care if you starve.Think about it.
Feel free to contact me about http://www.screeninginterviews.com/. It's useful at helping you efficiently identify winners and avoid losers.
TalTal Newhart (e-mail)ScreeningInterviews.com847.462.0632 dd
Friday, October 3, 2008
The WSJ Had It Right
The op ed piece in this Thursday's edition of the Wall Street Journal had it right...calling the federal market intervention plan a 'Wall Street bailout' is just plain inaccurate and a convenient ignoring of the truth. Whatever 'bailing' Washington is willing to do is as much for the benefit of all the home mortgagees who gleefully accepted the low APR, one year ARM at 125% loan to value with no certainty of making the payments unless their home increased in value by 25% a year as it is for any bank or wall street executive. When credit was readily available at record low rates, and the credit card offers kept pouring through the front door with agressive incentive balance transfer rates, these same consumers gladly accepted this 'found money' as if it was their god given American right.
Some how this has all been turned around, and the concepts of personal responsibilty and foresight have been conveniently forgotten. At the risk of sounding a bit Clintonian, "It's the payments, stupid". Non-performing, over valued mortgages are, at the root, the consumers problem. Wall Street doesn't owe Main Street a life preserver; Main Street didn't suffienctly manage their personal financial matters past their own nose. It's not all Bush's fault or those greedy credit pushers on Wall Street, or Freddie or Fannie's problem. Its an American problem, a society whose savings rate has consistently declined over the last 10 years, yet leads the world in the consumption of extraneous luxury goods like personal electronics and high-end purses, the natural result of a self-centric culture consumed with finding someone else to blame when something goes wrong.
The ability to apply small personal disciplines to our daily lives as practical steps toward the creation of an envisioned improved future state is a lost character trait in our culture. After all, we're told if we shop at WalMart we'll "live better", a pithy meaningless promise that subliminally encourages the direct connection between shopping (spending money) and living 'better'. What if WalMart's adds said "Stay at home once in a while and put that $500 you would have spent in our stores toward your mortgage prepayment. Then you'll live better"? Seems almost silly, doesn't it? But, it's our opinion a good bit more personal accountability all around for choices and actions, or the lack thereof, would do our economy good.
Some how this has all been turned around, and the concepts of personal responsibilty and foresight have been conveniently forgotten. At the risk of sounding a bit Clintonian, "It's the payments, stupid". Non-performing, over valued mortgages are, at the root, the consumers problem. Wall Street doesn't owe Main Street a life preserver; Main Street didn't suffienctly manage their personal financial matters past their own nose. It's not all Bush's fault or those greedy credit pushers on Wall Street, or Freddie or Fannie's problem. Its an American problem, a society whose savings rate has consistently declined over the last 10 years, yet leads the world in the consumption of extraneous luxury goods like personal electronics and high-end purses, the natural result of a self-centric culture consumed with finding someone else to blame when something goes wrong.
The ability to apply small personal disciplines to our daily lives as practical steps toward the creation of an envisioned improved future state is a lost character trait in our culture. After all, we're told if we shop at WalMart we'll "live better", a pithy meaningless promise that subliminally encourages the direct connection between shopping (spending money) and living 'better'. What if WalMart's adds said "Stay at home once in a while and put that $500 you would have spent in our stores toward your mortgage prepayment. Then you'll live better"? Seems almost silly, doesn't it? But, it's our opinion a good bit more personal accountability all around for choices and actions, or the lack thereof, would do our economy good.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)